WoLF is disappointed to learn that the U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear the case of Tingley v. Ferguson. The case centered around Washington state's SB 5722, a law that infringes on the rights of therapists and patients by mandating 'affirmation-only' therapy for minors with gender dysphoria.

Women gathered to speak about male violence. In response, men pepper sprayed and beat them

The brief to the Ninth Circuit in the case of Damiano v. Grants Pass School District argues that discussion of issues that impact women and girls must be protected speech as a matter of public concern

A bill currently making its way through the California legislature, AB 957, amends state family law to make not “affirming” a child's claimed “gender identity” child abuse.

Washington State’s SB 5722 would require licensed therapists to use “affirmation-only” therapy and effectively ban mental health care for detransitioners

On Tuesday, March 14th, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit voted against rehearing the case of Green v. Miss United States of America (MUSA). This vote upheld last year’s decision to protect the pageant on First Amendment grounds from being compelled to admit males as "natural born females.”

Learn how women’s rights advocacy is becoming viewed as “misconduct” and public targeting of legal work protecting women and girls from “gender identity” policies.

WoLF submitted comments to the Virginia Dept. of Education focused on free speech, safeguarding of bona fide occupational qualifications, and the incorrect use of Bostock to support unlawful guidance, and described improvements to be made to the policies, including the use of coherently-defined terms and the protection of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) students.

On Nov. 4, 2022, the parties in the case of Peter Vlaming v. West Point School Board took their arguments to the Virginia Supreme Court to determine whether Virginia public schools have the power to fire teachers who refuse to use incorrect sex-based “preferred pronouns” as demanded by school students. In May 2022, WoLF filed an amicus brief for this case, bringing our radical feminist arguments to the Virginia Supreme Court. This article provides an update about Peter Vlaming v. West Point School Board.

WoLF examines how a proposed change to Rule 8.4(g) of the Rules of Professional Conduct for lawyers will create a massive and novel intrusion into the beliefs and speech of lawyers regarding “gender identity” while they are in the courtroom -- and even when they are not actively involved in a case. This means that lawyers might be required by judges to use "preferred pronouns," or that "misgendering" will be viewed in the same light as racial slurs.

Over the past weekend, Standing for Women’s Kellie-Jay Keen (aka Posie Parker) held a Speaker’s Corner event where gender critical women gathered to discuss issues that affect women and girls.

WoLF has just filed a friend-of-the-court brief (also known as an amicus brief) with the Supreme Court of Virginia, in a case where a public school French language teacher was fired after attempting to avoid the use of incorrect male pronouns for a female student who believes she is a boy.

WoLF submitted an amicus brief to the Ninth Circuit on the case of Anita Noelle Green v. Miss United States of America. Read our summary or the brief as a whole.

“Crowder’s video was a satirical take on a very real crisis facing the most powerless women in our society. By censoring this content, Youtube has made clear that it considers ‘offensive’ material a greater threat to public safety than the actual violence against California’s incarcerated women.”

The Women’s Human Rights Campaign and the Women’s Liberation Front stand in solidarity with Dr. Kathleen Stock against the harassment she is facing for speaking up about the conflict between sex and so-called “gender identity.”

The court commissioner dismissed all charges against Thistle Pettersen without objection from the assistant district attorney.

For allegedly placing a "TERF Collective" sticker on a media box, Thistle Pettersen is now facing felony criminal charges.

“The pursuit of these charges is intended to chill the free speech of women’s rights advocates. If the police want to stop hate crimes, they should investigate the threats against Thistle instead of using tax-payer money to facilitate anti-woman bullying by extremist activists.”

Rachel Damiano and Katie Medart were placed on administrative leave after speaking out against state and district “gender identity” policies