LATEST NEWS

Gender Ideology Executive Director Gender Ideology Executive Director

WoLF Submits Comments to Virginia Department of Education

WoLF submitted comments to the Virginia Dept. of Education focused on free speech, safeguarding of bona fide occupational qualifications, and the incorrect use of Bostock to support unlawful guidance, and described improvements to be made to the policies, including the use of coherently-defined terms and the protection of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) students.

Read More
Gender Ideology Executive Director Gender Ideology Executive Director

Virginia Supreme Court Hears Arguments about Compelled Speech and “Preferred Pronouns”

On Nov. 4, 2022, the parties in the case of Peter Vlaming v. West Point School Board took their arguments to the Virginia Supreme Court to determine whether Virginia public schools have the power to fire teachers who refuse to use incorrect sex-based “preferred pronouns” as demanded by school students. In May 2022, WoLF filed an amicus brief for this case, bringing our radical feminist arguments to the Virginia Supreme Court. This article provides an update about Peter Vlaming v. West Point School Board.

Read More
Gender Ideology Executive Director Gender Ideology Executive Director

Take Action to Protect Women’s Careers: Los Angeles Film Critics Association Dismantles Sex-Based Acting AWards

We call upon the Los Angeles Film Critics Association (LAFCA) to immediately reverse its decision and reinstate sex-based awards categories for acting. Furthermore, we call upon LAFCA leaders to share the full language of this petition and the list of signatories with the entire LAFCA membership.

Read More
Gender Ideology Executive Director Gender Ideology Executive Director

New Legal Ethics Rule Threatens Attorney Free Speech

WoLF examines how a proposed change to Rule 8.4(g) of the Rules of Professional Conduct for lawyers will create a massive and novel intrusion into the beliefs and speech of lawyers regarding “gender identity” while they are in the courtroom -- and even when they are not actively involved in a case. This means that lawyers might be required by judges to use "preferred pronouns," or that "misgendering" will be viewed in the same light as racial slurs.

Read More

WoLF Commends Biden’s Selective Service System for Acknowledging Sex

The Women's Liberation Front commends the correct application of “sex” while strongly opposing the involuntary conscription of female civilians on the basis of so-called equity. WoLF further urges the Biden administration to apply the same logic it used in its recent announcement about conscription – a logic that acknowledges biological reality – in all other facets of governance.

Read More
Gender Ideology Executive Director Gender Ideology Executive Director

Gender Ideology's Influence in Women's Colleges: "We Should be Asking People, Why are Feminists Your Enemy?"

As an attendee of an elite institution that claims to be a women’s college, I was startled by what appears to be an obsession with “gender identity” and an abandonment of feminism permeating the culture and curriculum. I spoke with five of my gender critical female peers about the state of feminism at our college.

Read More
Gender Ideology Executive Director Gender Ideology Executive Director

WoLF Submits Public Comments to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

The proposed HHS regulations will redefine discrimination on the basis of sex, expanding it so that “gender identity” will be considered a form of sex-based discrimination. If HHS is allowed to include “gender identity” as a form of sex-based discrimination, healthcare providers in a wide variety of government programs will be forced to provide “gender affirming” medical interventions to patients.

Read More
Gender Ideology Executive Director Gender Ideology Executive Director

TAKE ACTION! Tell The Dept of HHS To Stop Government Funding of Gender Ideology

HHS has released proposed rulemaking titled Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities. These proposed regulations threaten women’s sex-based rights and they threaten healthcare providers who do not want to provide harmful, unnecessary cosmetic medical interventions under the guise of “gender-affirming care.”

Read More