WoLF is proud to announce the launch of our new WoLF Attorney Resource Network (WARN) — a professional network designed to connect attorneys who are standing firm in defense of women’s sex-based rights and fighting back against the legal codification of gender identity.

Advocates for the rights of incarcerated women cheered when President Trump signed Executive Order 14168, reversing a wide range of federal policies that elevate gender identity over sex, including in prisons. So why are men still in women’s prisons?

Mahmoud, et al. v. Taylor, et al: WoLF brings feminist arguments to the Supreme Court

President Trump’s executive orders (EOs) on sex and gender identity issues continue to face significant legal challenges. Some EOs remain in effect, while others are blocked in full or in part by federal courts. We’ve compiled a list of the cases we’re watching on gender identity.

Two courts issued temporary restraining orders preventing the transfer of male prisoners who identify as transgender women to male prisons. More will follow.  

On December 16th, California District Attorney Eric DuTemple was ordered by a California court to refer to Tremaine Carroll, accused of raping two women, by his preferred pronouns of “she/her”.

This year has been electrifying for our radical feminist efforts in the courts of law and public opinion! Thanks to your unwavering support, WoLF has fiercely advocated for women’s rights and achieved monumental strides in the relay run towards the total liberation of women and girls in 2024.

CA District Attorney DuTemple might become the first criminal prosecutor to be forced to refer to a convicted male rapist using opposite-sex pronouns in court. The motion may also force witnesses and victims of the man to refer to him as “she” and “her.”

As oral arguments in Skrmetti took place, protests erupted outside the Supreme Court from groups on both sides. The massive public attention this case has garnered from all sides shows how important it is to ensure feminist arguments are present in these debates: WoLF submitted an amicus brief this past October.

WoLF has taken the next steps in our groundbreaking legal battle to get men out of California women’s prisons. The case, Chandler v. Macomber (formerly Chander v. CDCR), centers on six women incarcerated in California who have all faced harm by being forced to live, work, and share private, intimate spaces with men who claim to be women. 

The ACLU’s latest intervention in WoLF’s California prison lawsuit shows just how little they care about women’s safety, dignity, and rights

WoLF filed an amicus brief to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Brown v. Alaska Airlines, which centers around two women fired for expressing their opposition to the Equality Act. 

This past year, WoLF has significantly expanded our bench of legal expertise in service to our charitable mission. Learn about the critical US court cases deciding the fate of sex-based rights!

Meet the newest plaintiffs in WoLF’s groundbreaking prison lawsuit, Chandler v. CDCR

The ‘Cruel and Unusual Punishment’ series by Independent Women’s Forum shares the voice of Tomiekia Johnson, one of the six plaintiffs in WoLF’s lawsuit to overturn self-ID laws in California’s prisons.

The amended complaint adds two additional plaintiffs and three more years of evidence of the failure of prison “self-ID” policies like SB 132

John Kluge lost his teaching position in Indiana for refusing to submit to 'transgender' naming demands by school district

WoLF is committed to pursuing every legal avenue to justice for Janine, Tomiekia, Krystal, Nadia, and all incarcerated women in California

Now is not the time to relent - we must increase demands for action on reproductive freedom

HB 1181 requires porn sites to use “reasonable age verification methods” to ensure that individuals attempting to access the content are not minors. Pornhub is suing to block the law.